Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397114
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (112)



 


 



Supreme Court Justices, Empathy, and Social Change: A Comment on Lani Guinier's Demosprudence Through Dissent


Linda C. McClain


Boston University - School of Law

April 30, 2009

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 589-604, 2009
Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-23

Abstract:     
Justice Souter's imminent retirement from the U.S. Supreme Court provides President Obama with his first opportunity for a judicial nomination to the high court. President Obama's remarks about the relevance of life experience and of empathy are sparking discussion of relevant judicial qualifications. This Essay examines Professor Lani Guinier's recent argument that dissenting justices, particularly through the use of oral dissents, may spur ordinary people to action and that such dissents may expand the range of democratic action, as part of what she and Gerald Torres call "demosprudence." That controversial decisions by the United States Supreme Court can spur dissenting citizens to action is, by now, a familiar idea. Offering as examples dissents by Justices Souter, Ginsburg, and Scalia, Guinier looks at the catalytic role of dissenting opinions. The Essay relates this current interest in the role of dissent - and the role of biography in spurring dissents - to earlier legal scholarship about the importance of empathy in judicial decision making and as a spur to social change. It considers the emphasis on life experience and the capacity for empathy in President Obama's statements about appropriate judicial qualifications. It concludes by contrasting Guinier's project with other perspectives on the institutional capacity of the Supreme Court to spur social transformation better to realize constitutional goals and values.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Supreme Court, dissent, empathy, social change, justice, demosprudence

JEL Classification: K19, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2009 ; Last revised: June 3, 2009

Suggested Citation

McClain, Linda C., Supreme Court Justices, Empathy, and Social Change: A Comment on Lani Guinier's Demosprudence Through Dissent (April 30, 2009). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 589-604, 2009; Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397114

Contact Information

Linda C. McClain (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,139
Downloads: 162
Download Rank: 107,880
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  112

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.235 seconds