Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397170
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (36)



 


 



After the Implosion: Trailing-Edge Guidelines for a New Era


Mark William Osler


University of St. Thomas - School of Law (Minnesota)

April 30, 2009

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This short article argues that the federal sentencing guidelines are both unprincipled and unstable (and certainly unloved) as currently constructed. The author suggests that the current leading-edge guidelines, in which advised sentences are fixed by a commission which leads judges to a sentence, be replaced by trailing-edge guidelines, in which the advisory baseline sentence would be created through a real-time electronic survey of judges' current practices in similar cases. Trailing-edge guidelines could provide uniformity and maintain the procedure of the current system while giving judges more discretion both in individual cases and in the way their decisions shape the guidelines themselves.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: sentencing, guidelines, sentencing guidelines, criminal law, federal

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2009 ; Last revised: January 26, 2010

Suggested Citation

Osler, Mark William, After the Implosion: Trailing-Edge Guidelines for a New Era (April 30, 2009). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397170

Contact Information

Mark William Osler (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas - School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States
(254) 717-7032 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 318
Downloads: 44
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  36

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.718 seconds