Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397224
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (136)



 


 



Voting Power Without Responsibility or Risk - How Should Proxy Reform Address the Decoupling of Economic and Voting Rights?


Roberta S. Karmel


Brooklyn Law School

April 30, 2009

Villanova Law Review, Vol. 55, 2010
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 146

Abstract:     
The regulation of proxy voting resides at an uncomfortable intersection between federal and state law. Although state law controls the holding of annual meetings to elect directors and the corporate governance aspects of proxy voting, the federal securities laws control the solicitation of proxies. Since at least 1977 shareholder activists have been trying to persuade the Securities and Exchange Committee (“SEC”) to revise the proxy solicitation disseminated by a public corporation to allow competing shareholder nominees to be included in opposition to the board of directors’ nominees. Although the SEC has proposed rules to this effect, such rules have not yet been adopted. An SEC rule permitting some shareholder access to management’s proxy is probably inevitable during the administration of Mary Schapiro as SEC Chair. If a shareholder access rule goes forward, one of the issues the SEC will have to address is which shareholders should be granted such access.

The growth of derivatives and various trading strategies by some investors have led to a decoupling of economic and voting rights in public corporations, permitting proxy voting by shareholders with little or no economic interest in the shares they vote. Such voting is referred to as “empty voting.” If the SEC engages in proxy reform to allow competing director nominees to appear on the same ballot, the problems of empty voting in a proxy contest are likely to be exacerbated unless the SEC addresses this issue. But the question of whether economic rights need to be aligned with voting rights in order for voting rights to be valid, would appear to be a state law, rather than a federal law, issue. Further, a recent Delaware Supreme Court case suggests that the Delaware courts are prepared to referee the skirmishes between institutional shareholders and corporate boards with regard to shareholder nominations, and recently enacted legislation in Delaware likewise would deal with shareholder proposals to amend by-laws to allow for shareholder nominees in a company proxy. Therefore, even if the SEC has authority with regard to granting some shareholders access to a company’s proxy, there is a policy question as to whether such regulation of corporate internal affairs is wise.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: empty voting, majority voting, proxy access, proxy rules, shareholder voting, vote buying, voting trusts, weighted voting

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Karmel, Roberta S., Voting Power Without Responsibility or Risk - How Should Proxy Reform Address the Decoupling of Economic and Voting Rights? (April 30, 2009). Villanova Law Review, Vol. 55, 2010; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 146. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397224

Contact Information

Roberta S. Karmel (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
(718) 780-7946 (Phone)
(718) 780-0375 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,702
Downloads: 370
Download Rank: 44,232
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  136

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds