Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397287
 


 



A 'Traditionalist's' Approach to Teaching O'Brien and to Ideology in the Classroom


Richard W. Bourne


University of Baltimore School of Law

Spring 1992

Missouri Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1992

Abstract:     
This article attempts to provide an eclectic approach to teaching O'Brien v. Cunard S.S. Co., 28 N.E. 266 (Mass. 1891), reprinted at 57 Mo. L. Rev. 347 (1992) in a first year Torts course. The piece acknowledges the strength of seeing cases like O'Brien through the lens of critical legal theory, law and economics, feminism, and critical race theory, but in the end rejects any single approach in favor of a kind of unabashed eclecticism. It strongly suggests that teaching law from a single approach runs the risk of overreaching and coercion. In addition, it pointed out the utility of having professors who approach law from different "schools" of thought compare notes on how their perspectives color what and how they teach their students.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: legal education, O'Brien v. Cunard S.S. Co., torts, critical legal theory, law and economics, feminism, critical race theory

JEL Classification: K13, K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 2, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Bourne, Richard W., A 'Traditionalist's' Approach to Teaching O'Brien and to Ideology in the Classroom (Spring 1992). Missouri Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1992. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397287

Contact Information

Richard W. Bourne (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
United States
410-837-4508 (Phone)
410-837-4560 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 528
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 236,469

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds