|
||||
|
||||
Five Approaches to Legal Reasoning in the Classroom: Contrasting Perspectives on O'Brien v. Cunard S.S. Co.Richard W. BourneUniversity of Baltimore School of Law Spring 1992 Missouri Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1992 Abstract: This paper is a brief Introduction to five articles dealing with the role a teacher's ideology might properly play in guiding his or her teaching by having the writers - each an afficionado of a particular "school" of academic thought (critical legal theory, law and economics, feminism, critical race theory, and a kind of traditional theoretical agnosticism) discuss how his or her perspective on law would color teaching a case appearing in many casebooks on Torts, O'Brien v. Cunard S.S. Co., 28 N.E. 266 (Mass. 1891), reprinted at 57 Mo. L. Rev. 347 (1992). The article briefly "states" the case in O'Brien and then introduces the other writers, whose papers ensue in the same volume.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12 Keywords: legal education, case method, torts, O'Brien v. Cunard S.S. Co., teaching ideology JEL Classification: K13, K19, K39 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 2, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds