North Carolina's Durational Residency Requirement for In-State Tuition: Violating the Constitution's Inherent Right to Travel
William S. Eubanks II
Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal; Vermont Law School; George Washington University - Law School; American University - Washington College of Law
February 19, 2010
Charlotte Law Review, Vol. 1, p. 199, 2009
North Carolina's current residency requirement mandates that a student establish legal domicile and subsequently satisfy a twelve-month waiting period before being recognized as a resident for in-state tuition purposes. This Article first provides background information detailing the history of North Carolina’s durational residency requirement for university tuition. Next, the Article analyzes Supreme Court jurisprudence in the context of durational residency requirements as they relate to the fundamental right to travel and to the privileges and immunities afforded to American citizens by the Constitution. The Article then utilizes this framework to analyze the UNC system-wide tuition policy to determine its constitutionality. The Article concludes by offering an alternative approach whereby the state of North Carolina can structure its residency requirement for tuition to meet its objectives without infringing on the constitutional rights of a subset of its university students.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: Constitution, right to travel, fundamental right, durational residency requirement, in-state tuition, resident tuition, North Carolina, university system, educational benefits, nonresidentAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 8, 2009 ; Last revised: February 24, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.313 seconds