A Glimmer of Insight

Teresa Brostoff

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

The Second Draft, Vol. 20, p. 10, August 2005
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research

In this Article, the author discusses one of her “best” classes, which evolved as legal writing students considered and decided a real case, using a brief submitted to one of the Pennsylvania appellate courts. Through panel deliberations as “judges,” the students quickly realized the advantage of a well-written brief and the detriment of a poorly written brief to attorneys and clients. Students also gained an understanding of the difference in tone and authority attributed to majority and dissenting opinions in cases as each panel voted on the outcome of the case. By experiencing the power of effective written and oral advocacy, students learned more about advocacy, perspective, tone, and professionalism than a lecture or reading could ever convey.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 2

Keywords: experiential learning, legal writing, opinion writing, appellate briefs, legal education, legal instruction LL.M., international law students

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: May 8, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Brostoff, Teresa, A Glimmer of Insight. The Second Draft, Vol. 20, p. 10, August 2005; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1399648

Contact Information

Teresa Brostoff (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-2364 (Phone)
412-648-2648 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.pitt.edu/faculty/profiles/brostofftk

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 315
Downloads: 23

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds