Shareholder Compensation as Dividend
James J. Park
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
May 8, 2009
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 108
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 148
This Article questions the prevailing view that securities fraud actions suffer from a circularity problem. Because shareholder plaintiffs are owners of the defendant corporation, it is commonly argued that shareholder compensation is a payment from shareholders to themselves with substantial transaction costs in the form of attorney fees. But shareholder compensation is no more circular than a dividend, which is a cash payment to shareholders from the company they own with substantial transaction costs in the form of taxes. In fact, shareholder compensation is less circular than a dividend because it is a transfer to shareholders who purchased stock when the price was inflated by fraud from those who did not. Shareholder compensation serves an important loss spreading function that is facilitated by the insurance market. Shareholder compensation may also capture some of the benefits of paying dividends, such as signaling and reducing agency costs, though it may do so more effectively if companies could resolve securities fraud actions by paying a preemptive dividend.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 51
Keywords: Securities, 10b-5, circularity, securities fraud, securities regulation, dividends, dividend puzzle, agency costs, signaling
Date posted: May 9, 2009 ; Last revised: June 22, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds