SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (279)

Beta

 


 



Complexity and Contradiction in Florida Constitutional Law

Patrick Gudridge
University of Miami - School of Law


May 8, 2009

University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-17

Abstract:     
This is not a short work. I take up in some detail two of the three principal judge-made limitations – more or less understood to be part of Florida constitutional law – addressing constitutional amendments: the distinction between self-executing and non self-executing constitutional provisions, and the ballot summary accuracy requirement. I have discussed a third such limitation – the initiative single subject requirement – in a previous article (I summarize that analysis in the appendix at the close of the manuscript.) These limitations are not unique to Florida, of course, but they are applied either with notable frequency in Florida or appear to have special significance in the state's constitutional law, in part because constitutional amendment is such a prominent and recurring part of the Florida scheme. Notably, although there is much good writing about state constitutional amendments, direct democracy, and the like, Florida law receives very little attention in that literature (which tends to be more West Coast focused.) The approach that I pursue is distinctive – if it is – because I treat amendment questions as presenting problems of constitutional organization, as opposed to, say, questions as to what voters need to know. I group drafters, voters, and subsequent interpreters as all engaged in one level in the same project (albeit at different stages.) As a result I am able to sketch three models of constitutional organization and associate the models with questions about Florida constitutional amendments that presented themselves at various points in time. I use the third model – complex organization – as a starting point for developing an approach to both the self-executing and ballot summary problems (as well as the single subject problem as sketched in the appendix.) The last part of the article connects the Florida discussion with issues evident in the larger academic discussion nationally.

Keywords: constitutional law, constitutional amendments, Florida Law, constitutional organization, ballot summary problems, state constitutional law

Working Paper Series

Date posted: May 09, 2009 ; Last revised: June 01, 2009

Suggested Citation

Gudridge, Patrick, Complexity and Contradiction in Florida Constitutional Law (May 8, 2009). University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1401404


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Patrick Gudridge (Contact Author)
University of Miami - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33124
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 94
Downloads: 21
Footnotes: 279

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 4 in 0.235 seconds.