Happiness and Revealed Preferences in Evolutionary Perspective
Richard A. Epstein
New York University School of Law; Stanford University - Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace; University of Chicago - Law School
Vermont Law Review, Vol. 33, 2009
Emotion in Context: Exploring the Interaction between Emotions and Legal Institutions Conference, University of Chicago Law School, May 2008
How do we understand human nature? The purpose of this Essay is to examine the relationship between human nature and social institutions. More concretely, the question is: What does an accurate account of human nature tell us about the choice of a desirable set of social institutions? Accounts of this sort typically focus on two key sticking points, one of ends and the other of means. On the former, Is individual self-interest the driving force behind all forms of human behavior? Do people care about themselves first? In the extreme, improbable, answer to this query, ordinary people do not care about any other individuals at all. In more modest versions, they display a degree of empathy and concern for their fellow individuals, best captured by Hume’s memorable phrase of “confin’d generosity.” On the latter, Do these (self-interested) persons select the proper, i.e., lowest cost, means to reach their chosen ends under conditions of uncertainty? Within the standard versions of neoclassical economics, both of these premises - self-interest and rationality - are generally posited as true.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 8, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.265 seconds