Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=140278
 


 



Pragmatism Returns to the Law in Insider Trading


Elliott J. Weiss


University of Arizona College of Law


Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998

Abstract:     
This article assesses the significance of the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. O'Hagan, 117 S.Ct. 2199 (1997). It reviews critically the history of the misappropriation theory of insider trading, highlighting the doctrinal tensions both between Santa Fe Industries v. Green and Chiarella v. U.S. and within Chiarella and Dirks v. SEC. The article then details how, in the course of arguing O'Hagan to the Court, the government developed an explanation ofhow misappropriation can involve informational fraud. One significant doctrinal aspect of O'Hagan was the Court's endorsement of the government's informational fraud theory, a move that also served to reconcile Santa Fe and Chiarella. More significantly, though, the Court resolved the doctrinal tensions within Chiarella and Dirks by explicitly relying on considerations of public policy to explain its support of the misappropriation theory. This, in the author's view, represented a welcome change from the more wooden modes of analysis the Court employed in two other recent decisions interpreting the federal securities laws.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: August 22, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Weiss, Elliott J., Pragmatism Returns to the Law in Insider Trading. Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=140278

Contact Information

Elliott J. Weiss (Contact Author)
University of Arizona College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
520-621-3578 (Phone)
520-621-9140 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 399

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds