Rethinking Subsidiarity in International Human Rights Adjudication
William M. Carter Jr.
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law
Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, 2009
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-30
This article suggests that a re-evaluation of the principle of subsidiarity is in order. While I make no sweeping claims that the principle of subsidiarity is always preferable or always undesirable, I do suggest that a close look at the myriad ways in which subsidiarity applies reveals that it may sometimes impede, rather than advance, the cause it purports to serve: namely, achieving universality of human rights. This article identifies situations where subsidiarity is more likely to diminish human rights protections that it is to advance them and suggests that subsidiarity should be abandoned or minimized in such areas.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: international law, international human rights law, treaties, margain of appreciation, deference, subsidiarity, European Court of Human Rights, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, International Covenant on Civil
JEL Classification: K33, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 14, 2009 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.715 seconds