We've Heard this Before: The Legacy of Interracial Marriage Bans and the Implications for Today's Marriage Equality Debates
Gregory N. Johnson
affiliation not provided to SSRN
June 16, 2009
Vermont Law Review, Fall 2009
Vermont Law School Research Paper No. 09-18
This article examines the many cases upholding bans on interracial marriage prior to 1948, the year the California Supreme Court became the first high court to strike down such a ban. The arguments courts made in defense of the ban on interracial marriage are strikingly similar to arguments made today against same-sex marriage. These include arguments based on religion and natural law, procreation, concern for the children, deference to the legislature, and the slippery-slope argument. The thesis of this article is that, given the commonality in arguments, the earlier struggle for marriage equality by interracial couples is relevant to today's debate on same-sex marriage. The ultimate rejection of the arguments against interracial marriage speaks to the long-term viability of the same arguments in the same-sex marriage debate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: California Supreme Court, Interracial Marriage, 1948, same-sex marriage debate, same sex marriage
Date posted: May 14, 2009 ; Last revised: June 29, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds