Rewriting the Horizontal Merger Guidelines in the Name of Dynamic Competition
Tilburg Law & Economics Center (TILEC), Tilburg University; Criterion Economics, L.L.C.
University of California, Berkeley - Business & Public Policy Group
May 18, 2009
George Mason Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 885-894, 2009
We favor revision of the Horizontal Merger Guidelines. Our preliminary comments in this essay are based on a work in progress that we provisionally entitle, “Favoring Dynamic Competition over Static Competition.” The eventual paper will address, in greater detail than we can explore here, how government enforcement agencies and courts would apply a more explicitly dynamic model of competition to merger analysis. We pose the following question: How must competition policy evolve if it is explicitly to favor Schumpeterian (dynamic) competition over neoclassical (static) competition? Of course, one also could ask that question with respect to intellectual property law and sector-specific regulation of network industries. We intend to do so in our eventual paper.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 14, 2009 ; Last revised: November 2, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.625 seconds