Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1404078
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



What Do Potential Jurors Know about Police Interrogation Techniques and False Confessions?


Richard A. Leo


University of San Francisco - School of Law

Brittany Liu


University of California, Irvine

April 1, 2009

Behavioral Sciences and the Law, April 2009
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2009-17

Abstract:     
Psychological police interrogation methods in America inevitably involve some level of pressure and persuasion to achieve their goal of eliciting confessions of guilt from custodial suspects. In this article, we surveyed potential jurors about their perceptions of a range of psychological interrogation techniques, the likelihood that such techniques would elicit a true confession from guilty suspects and the likelihood that such techniques could elicit a false confession from innocent suspects. Participants recognized that these interrogation techniques may be psychologically coercive and may elicit true confessions, but that psychologically coercive interrogation techniques are not likely to elicit false confessions. The findings from this survey study indicate that potential jurors believe that false confessions are both counter-intuitive and unlikely, even in response to psychologically coercive interrogation techniques that have been shown to lead to false confessions from the innocent. This study provides empirical support for the idea that expert witnesses may helpfully inform jurors about the social science research on psychologically coercive interrogation methods and how and why such interrogation techniques can lead to false confessions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: psychological police interrogation methods, law enforcement, false confessions, juries, expert testimony

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 14, 2009 ; Last revised: October 7, 2009

Suggested Citation

Leo, Richard A. and Liu, Brittany, What Do Potential Jurors Know about Police Interrogation Techniques and False Confessions? (April 1, 2009). Behavioral Sciences and the Law, April 2009; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2009-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1404078

Contact Information

Richard A. Leo (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Brittany Liu
University of California, Irvine ( email )
4201 Social & Behavioral Sciences Gateway
Psychology & Social Behavior Dept
Irvine, CA 62697-7085
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,407
Downloads: 232
Download Rank: 74,961
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.625 seconds