Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1404864
 
 

Footnotes (158)



 


 



Electronic Surveillance at the Virtual Border


Susan Freiwald


University of San Francisco School of Law

May 14, 2009

Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 78, 2008
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2009-15

Abstract:     
A virtual border divides people into two groups: those subject to the Fourth Amendment’s protections when the U.S. government conducts surveillance of their communications and those who are not. The distinction derives from a separation in powers: inside the virtual border, U.S. citizens and others enjoy the extensive oversight of the judiciary of executive branch surveillance. Judges review such surveillance before, during, and after it transpires. Foreign persons subject to surveillance in foreign countries fall within the executive branch’s’ foreign affairs function. However, the virtual border does not exactly match the physical border of the United States. Some people inside the physical border do not benefit from the constitutional protections. Others, outside the physical border do. For example, U.S. Persons inside the physical border may lose the Fourth Amendment protections if they engage in spying for a foreign country. When that happens, such persons are “exiled” over the virtual border to where surveillance takes place in the discretion of the executive branch. Properly understood, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”) represents the procedures by which people may be exiled and thereby deprived of the protections of judicial review. Because the consequences are so significant, the exiling decision itself must be subject to sufficient judicial oversight and review to ensure that executive branch officials not abuse exiling to avoid judicial scrutiny of surveillance. Recent events have shown that the executive branch has sought to exile people over the virtual border without a sufficient showing to a judge to protect constitutional rights. To the extend laws permit such exiling with sufficient justification, oversight, and accountability, they should be fixed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: virtual border, Fourth Amendment, cyberspace, surveillance, wiretap, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA, foreign affairs, constitutional protection

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 27, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Freiwald, Susan, Electronic Surveillance at the Virtual Border (May 14, 2009). Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 78, 2008; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2009-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1404864

Contact Information

Susan Freiwald (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
415-422-6467 (Phone)
415-422-6433 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 662
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 181,685
Footnotes:  158

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.812 seconds