Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1405371
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (328)



 


 



Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States


Teneille R. Brown


University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Emily R. Murphy


Stanford Law School

May 21, 2009

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 62, 2010
Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain

Abstract:     
As with phrenology and the polygraph, we are again confronted with a device that the media claims to be capable of reading our minds. This new device is functional magnetic resonance imaging ("fMRI"), and it is currently being introduced to negate a criminal defendant's mens rea, such as the specific intent to kill. In this paper we will demonstrate that functional brain images should not currently be admitted into courts for this purpose. We will do so by walking through each step of the imaging methodology in plain terms, making it clear why the brain images are minimally probative when introduced to prove a defendant’s mens rea, and almost certainly substantially more prejudicial than probative on balance. Our commitment to staying close to the science is what separates our article from others, as the previous articles do not spend enough time engaging with the methodology, and in so doing they espouse a far too rosy picture of its probative value. While further research needs to be conducted on mock jurors, preliminary findings suggest that the mere presentation of brain images can make a bad argument appear more sensible. We address other forms of prejudice as well, such as fMRI's potential to mislead jurors and waste the court's resources. As the methodology may one day improve such that the probative value is no longer eclipsed by the extreme potential for prejudice, we offer at the end a non-exhaustive checklist that judges or counsel can use to authenticate the functional brain images and assess the weight these images are to be accorded by fact-finders.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 91

Keywords: neuroscience, fMRI, mens rea, 403, prejudicial evidence, mind reading, neuroimaging, brain images

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 15, 2009 ; Last revised: February 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Brown, Teneille R. and Murphy, Emily R., Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States (May 21, 2009). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 62, 2010; Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1405371

Contact Information

Teneille R. Brown (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Emily R. Murphy
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,964
Downloads: 545
Download Rank: 26,751
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  328

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.579 seconds