|
||||
|
||||
Aspirational Preferences and Their Representation by Risk MeasuresDavid B. BrownDuke University - Decision Sciences Enrico G. De GiorgiUniversity of St. Gallen - SEPS: Economics and Political Sciences Melvyn SimNUS Business School, National University of Singapore February 14, 2012 Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 09-19 U. of St. Gallen Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2009-07 Abstract: The appendix can be found at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2005194 We consider choice over uncertain, monetary payoffs and study a general class of preferences. These preferences favor diversification, except perhaps on a subset of sufficiently disliked acts, over which concentration is instead preferred. This structure encompasses a number of known models (e.g., expected utility and several variants under a concave utility function). We show that such preferences share a representation in terms of a family of measures of risk and targets. Specifically, the choice function is equivalent to selection of a maximum index level such that the risk of beating the target at that level is acceptable. This representation may help to uncover new models of choice. One that we explore in detail is the special case when the targets are bounded. This case corresponds to a type of satisficing and has descriptive relevance. Moreover, the model is amenable to large-scale optimization.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: Representation of choice, risk measures, aspiration levels, decision theory paradoxes JEL Classification: D81 working papers seriesDate posted: May 22, 2009 ; Last revised: February 23, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.547 seconds