The Rise of Rhetoric in Tax Reform Debate: An Example
Marjorie E. Kornhauser
Tulane University School of Law
Tulsa. Law Review, Vol. 70, p. 2345, 1996
In the United States, rhetoric has always been an intrinsic part of tax debates. The rhetoric of current debates, however, is even more heated than the great debates of the 1980s. Today, rhetoric has so expanded both quantitatively and qualitatively that the real issues have all but disappointed from public discussion. After briefly explaining the basic tax issues involved, this Essay examines the increased use of rhetoric in the tax area. As an illustration of quantitative expansion, the Essay compares two reports prepared by the Joint Economic Committee, a committee established to provide legal assistance to Congress on technical and specialized matters. The 1984 report, largely devoid of rhetoric, provided an analytical framework for congressional discussion by presenting both sides of the basic tax issues. The 1995 report largely devoid of analysis, provided a rhetorical platform to advance only one side of the issues-the pro flat, consumption side. As an example of the qualitative expansion of rhetoric, the Essay notes the rise of a new rhetorical device. Generational warfare – pitting the old against the youth –now joins class warfare as a potent tool in the rhetorical arsenal. The Essay concludes that the expanded rhetoric, especially in government reports such as the JEC reports, is detrimental to the rational public debates necessary for a healthy democracy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27
Keywords: flat tax, generational accounting, income tax, politics, rhetoric, tax policy, tax reformAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 22, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.844 seconds