Reconstructing Reconstruction: Some Problems for Originalists (and for Everyone Else, Too)
New York University School of Law
May 18, 2009
Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2009
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-32
Reconstruction, America's Second Founding, plays a remarkably small role in constitutional theory. This paper, prepared as part of a symposium aimed at addressing that neglect, discusses the serious interpretive problems posed by an attempt to work Reconstruction - and its aftermath - into the constitutional canon. These problems range from the paucity of extant materials to help understand the intentions of the ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment, to the lack of any place in constitutional theory for dealing with constitutional events amendments the country ratifies then effectively rejects. Problems such as these pose an almost insurmountable difficulty for originalists - but they don't make life easy for other interpretive methodologies either. This paper bears upon the history of the Reconstruction Amendments, as well as interpretive theory.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 21, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds