Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1406746
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (163)



 


 



Reappraising the Jury's Role as Finder of Fact


Martin A. Kotler


Widener University - School of Law

January 1, 1985

Georgia Law Review, Vol. 20, 1985

Abstract:     
This Article addresses the question of whether and under what circumstances a trial judge should give a jury a so-called “ultimate outcome instruction,” informing the jurors of the legal consequences which will flow from their factual determinations. Thus, for example, in a state where a finding that the plaintiff’s negligence was equal to the defendant’s will result in no recovery, should the jury be so instructed. Similarly, should jurors be told whether awards are taxable in a civil case or instructed on sentencing practices in a criminal case.

It concludes that unless such an instruction is legislatively mandated, it is inappropriate for the judge to give such an instruction since it is intended to or permits the jury to manipulate their factual findings to evade the result contemplated by the legislature.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: jury, juries, trials, jury instructions

JEL Classification: K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 20, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Kotler, Martin A., Reappraising the Jury's Role as Finder of Fact (January 1, 1985). Georgia Law Review, Vol. 20, 1985. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1406746

Contact Information

Martin A. Kotler (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
P.O. Box 7286
Wilmington, DE 19803-0474
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 352
Downloads: 32
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  163

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds