Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1406813
 
 

Citations



 


 



Reconsidering the Actual Contract Theory of Political Obligation


Margaret P. Gilbert


University of California, Irvine

January 1999

Ethics: An International Journal of Social

Abstract:     
Do people have obligations by virtue of the fact that a given country is their country? Actual contract theory says they do because they have agreed to act in certain ways. Contemporary philosophers standardly object in terms of the 'no agreement' objection and the 'not morally binding' objection. I argue that the 'not morally binding' objection is not conclusive. As for the 'no agreement' objection, though actual contract theory succumbs, a closely related plural subject theory of political obligation does not. Plural subject theory may be the truth in actual contract theory and should be explored in its stead.

Keywords: Contract, Ethics, Obligation, Politics

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 19, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Gilbert, Margaret P., Reconsidering the Actual Contract Theory of Political Obligation (January 1999). Ethics: An International Journal of Social. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1406813

Contact Information

Margaret P. Gilbert (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine ( email )
Humanities Office Building
Irvine, CA 92697-4555
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.faculty.uci.edu/profile.cfm?faculty_id=5365
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 401

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.562 seconds