SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Water Privatization Trends in the United States: Human Rights, National Security, and Public Stewardship

Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold
University of Louisville - Brandeis School of Law



William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, Vol. 33, p. 785, 2009
University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-06

Abstract:     
This article examines 3 aspects of water privatization in the United States: 1) the privatization of public water services and systems; 2) the dominance of private property rights in water amid a complex legal regime of mixed public and private characteristics of water; and 3) the cultural framing of water as a consumer commodity. These trends raise significant human rights issues, not unlike global debates over human rights to water, and also critical national security issues related to conflict and scarcity, foreign control over domestic water supplies, and vulnerability to terrorism. More importantly, though, the article critiques the sustainability of the privatization and commodification of water in terms of the ecological, temporal, geographic, socio-ethical, policy, and economic integrity and sustainability of waters and watersheds.

The article concludes that human rights legal theories lack the capacity to resolve concerns about meeting the human need for water. Likewise, national security policies are too limited to address larger issues of long-term water governance to ensure secure, stable, and sustainable water supplies for the public.

The article proposes an alternative concept: public stewardship of water. This concept is based on the public ownership and control of water (i.e., the state ownership doctrine), subject to private property interests in water that are usufructuary in nature and regulated by the government for the public interest. These property interests in water should be seen as part of a "web of interests" defined by the unique and multi-faceted characteristics of water, including its role in sustaining all life. However, the government should be held to 6 fiduciary duties with respect to all water resources, moving beyond the traditional public trust doctrine: 1) the duty of security; 2) the duty of conservation; 3) the duty of sustainability; 4) the duty of equity; 5) the duty of investment; and 6) the duty of long-range, place-based planning. All stakeholders, including the public, should share in the government's responsibility for acting on these duties.

Keywords: water, privatization, property, commodification, watersheds, human rights, national security, public rights, stewardship, fiduciary, public utilities, sustainability, environment, ecology, equity, public trust, state ownership, usufructuary, conservation

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: May 21, 2009 ; Last revised: October 13, 2009

Suggested Citation

Arnold, Craig Anthony (Tony), Water Privatization Trends in the United States: Human Rights, National Security, and Public Stewardship (May 20, 2009). William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, Vol. 33, p. 785, 2009; University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2009-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1407720


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Craig (Tony) Anthony Arnold (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
502-852-6388 (Phone)
502-852-0862 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.louisville.edu/user/61
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 420
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 83,607
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.093 seconds.