Adding Players to the Game: Parentage Determinations When Assisted Reproductive Technology is Used to Create Families
Linda S. Anderson
Stetson University College of Law
May 26, 2009
Arkansas Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, p. 29, 2009
Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-15
Though some forms of assisted reproduction (ART) have been available for a long time, more recent scientific advances in reproductive technology created opportunities for more people to build families, but consequently caused confusion about who should be considered a parent. In addition, changing family relationships have caused questions about who should be considered a parent.
This article attempts to compare the way various courts identify the legal parents of a child born through assisted reproductive technology. After updating existing discussions about the way parentage decisions are made in ART situations the article provides additional support for creating a predictable and consistent approach to situations that scientific advances force courts and legislatures to address.
With little statutory guidance and constrained by individual and varying state law and public policy, courts have attempted to fashion results while generally trying to avoid usurping legislative powers. This article suggests that until legislatures establish clear guidelines for identifying parents, intent to create a child to raise as one’s own should determine parentage when any form of ART is utilized. In fact, as legislatures tackle this complicated issue, intent can provide a reasonable determining factor of a legal parent.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: ART, assisted reproduction, parentage, parent child, IVF, in vitro fertilization, alternative families
JEL Classification: J12, J13, J18, K39
Date posted: May 29, 2009 ; Last revised: October 16, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds