Footnotes (41)



The Domestic Violence Clause in 'New Originalist' Theory

Mark S. Stein

affiliation not provided to SSRN

May 28, 2009

Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Forthcoming

In this brief essay, I address the way in which "new originalists" Jack Balkin and Lawrence Solum use the Domestic Violence Clause in Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution to support their theories. Balkin uses the Domestic Violence Clause to provide an example of an impermissible departure from original meaning: surely, he claims, it would be wrong to interpret the constitutional term "domestic violence" as referring to spousal abuse. Solum uses the same example to support his thesis that the semantic meaning of the Constitution is fixed at the time of origin.

In fact, the constitutional term "domestic violence" could evolve so that an application of the Domestic Violence Clause to spousal abuse no longer seems absurd. Reflection on this possibility yields some insights about originalism and original expected applications.

Comments are welcome.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: originalism

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: May 29, 2009 ; Last revised: October 16, 2009

Suggested Citation

Stein, Mark S., The Domestic Violence Clause in 'New Originalist' Theory (May 28, 2009). Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411282

Contact Information

Mark S. Stein (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 743
Downloads: 130
Download Rank: 124,280
Footnotes:  41

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds