Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411733
 
 

Citations



 


 



Federalism, Full Disclosure, and the National Markets in the Interpretation of Federal Securities Law


Dennis S. Karjala


Arizona State University College of Law

1986

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 80, 1986

Abstract:     
Under federal securities law, emphasis on both Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green, principles, disclosure and federalism, is misguided. While the Court rightly attempted to limit the otherwise almost unbounded application of rule 10b-5, emphasis on a 'philosophy of full disclosure' fails to take into consideration crucial differences between provisions that regulate specific transactions and general, catchall provisions like rule 10b-5. The result is an overly limited interpretation of the specific federal regulatory provisions, which can frustrate Congress' purpose in adopting them and fails to limit the reach of the catchall rules. There should be a much more limited role for general principles of 'full disclosure' in the interpretation of both specific regulatory provisions and the rule 10b-5 catchall.

The author suggests a general principle of interpretation, called the 'Disclosure principle,' pursuant to which all references to a general philosophy or policy of full disclosure are avoided in interpreting the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether the provision in question regulates a specific transaction or is a general catchall. The Disclosure Principle provides a well-defined and sharply limited role for disclosure as such - that is, independent of a more comprehensive fraudulent scheme - in the interpretation of rule 10b-5.

The author also suggests Federalism Principles 4 and 5, based on the distinction between the specific regulatory provisions of the federal securities statutes and the catchall provisions. Appeals to general principles of federalism usually will not be helpful in interpreting the specific regulatory provisions of federal securities law, but that the federal interest in maintaining free and honest national markets can and probably should play an important role in interpreting and applying the catchall provisions.

Keywords: Federalism, Federal Securities Law, Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 30, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Karjala, Dennis S., Federalism, Full Disclosure, and the National Markets in the Interpretation of Federal Securities Law (1986). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 80, 1986. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411733

Contact Information

Dennis S. Karjala (Contact Author)
Arizona State University College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
480-965-4010 (Phone)
480-965-2427 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.public.asu.edu/~dkarjala
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 353

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds