Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411783
 


 



Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the the Microsoft Case?


John E. Lopatka


Penn State Law

William H. Page


University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law

May 29, 2009

Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001)
George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, 2001

Abstract:     
This article, published in 2001, shortly after the D.C. Circuit's decision in the Microsoft case, considers which classes of plaintiffs might have suffered antitrust injury as a result of Microsoft's illegal conduct. We suggest that consumers, computer manufacturers, and competitors, particularly Netscape, would all face significant challenges in proving that they were harmed either by an illegal overcharge or by inefficiently exclusionary conduct.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: antitrust, Microsoft, monopolization, antitrust injury, damages

JEL Classification: I41, l42, K21, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 30, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Lopatka, John E. and Page, William H., Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the the Microsoft Case? (May 29, 2009). Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001); George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411783

Contact Information

John E. Lopatka
Penn State Law ( email )
337 Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
William Hepburn Page (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 237
Downloads: 44

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.719 seconds