Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411803
 


 



Frivolous Cases


Suja A. Thomas


University of Illinois College of Law

May 29, 2009

DePaul Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 633, 2010
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 08-36

Abstract:     
The problem of frivolous cases is invoked in a variety of contexts. Although the term is used in the context of Rule 11, it is also used to justify many procedural and substantive changes to the law. For example, concern about frivolous cases is invoked to defend the use of procedural devices that limit litigants' access to courts, including summary judgment, motions to dismiss, heightened pleading, and caps, as well as to justify the narrowing of rights in substantive areas such as prisoner's cases and employment discrimination cases. This symposium essay argues for a different view of frivolous cases - a view that eschews the use of the term and instead proposes a new discussion of the relationship of cost to other rights, including the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: frivolous, jury trial, Seventh Amendment, trial, litigation, cost, Rule 11, summary judgment, motion to dismiss, caps, heightened pleading, prisoner, employment discrimination

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 30, 2009 ; Last revised: June 15, 2010

Suggested Citation

Thomas, Suja A., Frivolous Cases (May 29, 2009). DePaul Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 633, 2010; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 08-36. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411803

Contact Information

Suja A. Thomas (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,631
Downloads: 203
Download Rank: 83,105

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.344 seconds