Better Living Through Legislation: The Control of Mind-Altering Drugs
Robert D. Bartels
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
Kansas Law Review, Vol. 21, 1973
Mind-altering drugs have probably always been a concern to human society. During the past several years, however, public concern about the use of mind-altering drugs has risen sharply. The public debate over mind-altering drugs has dealt with many different questions, including the drugs' medical, psychological, and sociological effects, as well as the appropriate societal responses. These questions are closely related and have often been confused with one another. This article will deal in some measure with all of them, but will address itself ultimately to the proper legislative response to the question of what controls should be imposed.
This article generally takes an approach that has been called social cost-accounting. The premise of social cost-accounting is that every law that seeks to control human behavior entails social costs, as well as social benefits, and that laws should be chosen to maximize the excess of benefits over costs. The clear implication is that, at the least, we should choose controls that entail more benefits than costs - or we should have no controls at all. This article does will not attempt to give the proper legislative response to any of the presently troublesome mind-altering drugs; rather, it attempts to provide the beginnings of a calculus by means of which the proper responses can be determined.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: drugs, criminal law, health lawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 30, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.703 seconds