References (78)



When Low is No Good: Predatory Pricing and US antitrust law (1950-1980)

Nicola Giocoli

University of Pisa

June 1, 2009

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, December 2011

The history of predatory pricing law and economics is peculiar on account of the seemingly inescapable contradiction between the legal habit of condemning a business practice on account of its possible unfair and inefficient effects and the necessity of providing an economic rationale for the condemnation without undermining the essence of competition itself. The apparently rock-solid equation “low price = good price” makes such a rationale neither immediate nor easy to find – and predatory pricing such an interesting issue from the viewpoint of historians of economics. How to circumvent the equation has been the challenge for several of the most brilliant minds of postwar microeconomics, as well as for outstanding law scholars. It is a fascinating story, with deep implications for at least two major historiographic issues: first, the evolution of neoclassical economics, as embodied in one of its most important branches, industrial organization; second, the relationship between the formal results of theoretical economics and their policy implications, in a particular their applicability for courtroom litigation.

This is the first in a pair of papers dedicated to this story. The division between the two works is strictly chronological: the present paper covers the period from the 1950s to about 1980, that is to say, until the verge of the game-theoretic revolution in industrial organization; the other will focus on the period 1980–2000, covering the above-mentioned revolution and its relationship with a couple of remarkable Supreme Court’s decisions on predatory pricing. The main thesis of the two works is that the traditional dichotomy between alternative legal standards, those based on “stories” and those based on “rules”, may prove useful in interpreting the evolution of economists’ thought about predatory pricing and, more generally, in explaining under what conditions a theoretical statement may have an effective policy impact, especially in courtrooms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: predatory pricing, antitrust, Supreme Court, Chicago school, Harvard school, price theory

JEL Classification: B21, K21, L41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 1, 2009 ; Last revised: November 30, 2011

Suggested Citation

Giocoli, Nicola, When Low is No Good: Predatory Pricing and US antitrust law (1950-1980) (June 1, 2009). European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, December 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1412808

Contact Information

Nicola Giocoli (Contact Author)
University of Pisa ( email )
Department of Law
HOME PAGE: http://https://pisa.academia.edu/NicolaGiocoli
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,565
Downloads: 360
Download Rank: 54,365
References:  78

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.266 seconds