|
||||
|
||||
What Should GAAP Look Like? A Survey and Economic Analysis
S.P. Kothari Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management Karthik Ramanna Harvard University - Harvard Business School Douglas J. Skinner The University of Chicago - Booth School of Business September 17, 2009 MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4740-09 Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper No. 09-137 University of Chicago - Booth School of Business Working Paper No. 09-22 Abstract: Based on extant literature, we articulate a positive theory of GAAP under the assumption that the objective is to facilitate the efficient allocation of capital within an economy. The theory predicts that GAAP’s principal focus, as shaped by the demand for and supply of financial information, is on the use of the income statement and balance sheet for performance measurement and control (stewardship). This is consistent with efficient contracting considerations guiding financial reporting. Financial reports produced under this model also generate information useful for equity valuation but this is not the primary objective. Thus, artificially imposing equity valuation as the primary objective of financial reporting standards will result in GAAP rules that are unlikely to serve stakeholders’ needs. The theory allows us to compare and contrast extant GAAP, as observed in a regulated setting, with GAAP that might arise endogenously as a result of market forces. Building on previous research, we argue that verifiability and conservatism, while detracting from accounting’s role in equity valuation, are critical features of GAAP under efficient contracting. We recognize the advantage of using fair values in circumstances where these are based on observable prices in liquid secondary markets but caution against expanding fair values to financial reporting more generally. We conclude that rather than converging U.S. GAAP with IFRS, competition between the FASB and the IASB would allow GAAP to better respond to market forces.
JEL Classifications: M41, M44, M47 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: June 03, 2009 ; Last revised: September 22, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.156 seconds.