Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=141381
 


 



The Summons Power and the Limits of Theory: A Reply to Professor Hyman


Leo P. Martinez


University of California Hastings College of the Law

May 1997

Tulane Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, 1997

Abstract:     
Professor David Hyman's recent article, "When Rules Collide: Procedural Intersection and the Rule of Law," which appeared in the last issue of the Tulane Law Review, explains the problems associated with what he terms "procedural intersections." Professor Hyman finds that a "procedural intersection" occurs when parties are engaged in separate adjudicative proceedings in different fora, regarding the same issue, and each forum offers competing procedural rules.

Dean Martinez's criticism of Professor Hyman's theory is not centered on the grand vision Professor Hyman takes, but rather on the narrow grounds that would appear to preclude the use of the administrative summons power in the Tax Court.

The criticism is in three parts. The first part is that Professor Hyman's theory understates the extent of the sovereign's power to tax. The second is that Professor Hyman's theory emphasizes the "level playing field" in the tax context to an unjustified extent. The third is that Professor Hyman's theoretical construct simply does not apply in the Tax Court.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: December 3, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Martinez, Leo P., The Summons Power and the Limits of Theory: A Reply to Professor Hyman (May 1997). Tulane Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=141381

Contact Information

Leo P. Martinez (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-565-4682 (Phone)
415-565-4865 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 440

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.234 seconds