Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=141384
 
 

Citations



 


 



Erie and the Irrelevance of Legal Positivism


Jack Landman Goldsmith III


Harvard Law School

Steven D. Walt


University of Virginia School of Law


Virginia Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, 1998

Abstract:     
Conventional wisdom holds that there is a connection between (a) the jurisprudential commitment to legal positivism expressed in Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, and (b) Erie's holding that the common law powers of federal courts exercised in Swift v. Tyson are unconstitutional. In this essay we analyze and challenge this conventional wisdom. The conventional wisdom is sometimes expressed as an historical connection between beliefs about positivism and Erie's overruling of Swift. We think this historical claim lacks affirmative support, overlooks significant evidence to the contrary, and misleadingly views Erie's pre-history through the distorting lens of Holmes' dissents. Other times the conventional wisdom is expressed as a conceptual or normative connection between the truth of positivism and Erie's holding. We think these contentions too are wrong. Our claim here is one of irrelevance: Erie's commitment to legal positivism is conceptually and normatively independent of its constitutional holding. Legal positivism is a general theory about the nature of law. Even if true, it has no implications for the allocation of authority between the state and federal governments. This argument shows that Erie is not a decision about the nature of law, but rather reflects a particular time-bound set of constitutional and policy priorities. It helps to explain why some recent philosophical attacks on Erie are groundless. It demonstrates that the many outstanding mysteries about the practical implications of Erie's holding cannot, as many think, be resolved by recourse to legal positivism. And it presents a cautionary lesson about the dangers that inhere in attempting to derive constitutional conclusions from theories
about law.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: December 3, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Goldsmith, Jack Landman and Walt, Steven D., Erie and the Irrelevance of Legal Positivism. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=141384

Contact Information

Jack Landman Goldsmith III (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Steven D. Walt
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
804-924-7930 (Phone)
804-924-7536 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,446

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds