Citations (4)



Republican Moments: The Role of Direct Popular Power in the American Constitutional Order

James Gray Pope

Rutgers Law School - Newark

December 1, 1990

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 139, No. 2, 1990
Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Papers No. 052

Republican moments occur during periods when large numbers of normally quiescent citizens enter the public arena to struggle over long-term issues of principle. Constituencies that are under-represented in interest-group bargaining use mass protest and other forms of direct popular power to place their concerns on the public agenda. Aroused citizens disrupt cozy relationships among politicians, administrators, and interest group lobbyists. Examples include the Revolutionary era, the Jacksonian period, the Civil War and Reconstruction, the Populist era, the New Deal, and the 1960s. Most of the great rights we celebrate today were products of the unruly and passionate politics of republican moments. The Constitution, of course, erects a system of representative - not direct - democracy. Its most effective proponents sought to temper special interest politics with deliberations among an elite of virtuous representatives, not with pulses of direct popular power. The Bill of Rights, however, added a potentially subversive supplement to the representative scheme. Read in historical context, the First Amendment carves out the constitutional space for direct popular power. In the political theory and practice of the founding generation, the right of the people peaceably to assemble encompassed not only the right to meet, but also to exercise extra-institutional forms of power, ranging from nonviolent rallies and boycotts to the displacement of representative government by popular assemblies. Direct power was seen as a necessary corrective to the natural tendency of government to degenerate into corruption and tyranny. Here, as elsewhere, the framers deliberately built a conflict into the constitutional scheme, this one between representative government and direct popular power. The theory of republican moments has two major implications for legal doctrine. First, it provides arguments for expanding the protection of direct popular power under the first amendment. Understanding the long-run functions of direct power may help to forge the kind of civic courage that can sustain a commitment to free speech and assembly in the midst of popular tumult. Second, the theory suggests that courts and administrative agencies should give a broad construction to the statutory and constitutional products of republican moments. For brief periods of time, at a considerable cost to business-as-normal, direct popular power offsets the worst flaws of interest group bargaining. These times should be seen as precious - albeit unsettling - moments of effective democracy. When the level of participation subsides, courts and administrative agencies should serve as agents of the republican moment, preserving the thrust of republican laws against the relative lethargy and corruption of interest group bargaining. Failure to do so can only reflect, as Frederick Douglass lamented when the Supreme Court invalidated the Civil Rights Act of 1875, a failure of historical memory.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 83

Keywords: constitutional law, popular constitutionalism, freedom of assembly, statutory interpretation, liberal pluralism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 15, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Pope, James Gray, Republican Moments: The Role of Direct Popular Power in the American Constitutional Order (December 1, 1990). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 139, No. 2, 1990; Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Papers No. 052. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1416797

Contact Information

James Gray Pope (Contact Author)
Rutgers Law School - Newark ( email )
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
973-744-3642 (Phone)
973-353-1445 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 845
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 157,539
Citations:  4

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds