The Other Side of the Story: Using Graphic Organizers to Counter the Counter-Analysis Quandary
Drexel University - Earle Mack School of Law
Christine Nero Coughlin
Wake Forest University - School of Law
June 9, 2009
University of Baltimore Law Review, 2010
Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law Research Paper Series No. 2009-A-17
In law school, it is critical for students to look at issues from both sides, whether in responding to a law school exam hypothetical or in writing predictive memorandum assignments. In teaching students to engage in thoughtful legal analysis, therefore, professors should provide strategies to help students address counter-analysis as a critical component of the analysis. Developing a method for effectively teaching counter-analysis is important because good lawyering requires complex analysis that recognizes the subtleties of the situation being analyzed.
This article begins by defining counter-analysis generally and using social science and educational psychology theory to explain why the process is difficult. The article next examines relevant learning theory about cognition and illustrates how learning tools, such as graphic organizers, can assist with encoding analytical skills in the student’s long-term memory. The article then offers several examples for how law professors can apply cognitive learning theory to their classroom teaching of counter-analysis using graphic organizers. The article concludes by arguing that the teaching of counter-analysis, while difficult, is critical to fully develop a student’s analytic ability and should be taught using organized, systematic, active instructional techniques.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: counter-analysis, counter-argument, graphic organizers, cognitive learning theory, teaching, legal analysisAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 11, 2009 ; Last revised: July 3, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.640 seconds