Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1417621
 
 

Footnotes (164)



 


 



Anna Nicole Smith Goes Shopping: The New Forum Shopping Problem in Bankruptcy


G. Marcus Cole


Stanford Law School

Todd J. Zywicki


George Mason University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center

June 10, 2009

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-29
Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 376
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1417621
Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2009-11

Abstract:     
The American bankruptcy system is a hybrid of state law and federal bankruptcy law. Under the Butner principle, federal bankruptcy courts preserve non-bankruptcy law substantive entitlements in bankruptcy unless bankruptcy policies compel a contrary result.

This hybrid system, however, gives rise to the threat of forum-shopping if parties attempt to invoke bankruptcy jurisdiction for improper purposes, namely to rearrange non-bankruptcy entitlements to advance no coherent bankruptcy policy. Modern developments in bankruptcy law, as exemplified in the case of Marshall v. Marshall raise a novel threat of bankruptcy forum-shopping. Marshall involved the bankruptcy of tabloid starlet Anna Nicole Smith and her efforts to recover from the estate of deceased billionaire oilman J. Howard Marshall. Rather than deferring to the processes of the Texas probate court, Smith raced into bankruptcy court in California to capture a large share of Marshall’s estate. The technical issue in the case concerns whether the dispute constituted a “core” matter under federal bankruptcy law and thus the timing of the entry of a final judgment by the bankruptcy court. If the Marshall Bankruptcy Court’s decision is allowed to stand, it could set a precedent for rampant forum-shopping by dissatisfied parties seeking a more favorable resolution of claims in federal bankruptcy court than that to which they would be entitled under state law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: “absolute priority” rule, core, creditors, David Skeel, debtors, Granfinanciera v. Nordberg, non-core, Northern Pipeline v. Marathon Pipeline, Thomas Jackson

JEL Classification: G33

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 11, 2009 ; Last revised: March 30, 2011

Suggested Citation

Cole, G. Marcus and Zywicki, Todd J., Anna Nicole Smith Goes Shopping: The New Forum Shopping Problem in Bankruptcy (June 10, 2009). George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-29; Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 376; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1417621; Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2009-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1417621 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1417621

Contact Information

G. Marcus Cole
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Todd J. Zywicki (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8091 (Phone)
703-993-8088 (Fax)

George Mason Law School Logo

PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,688
Downloads: 291
Download Rank: 56,461
Footnotes:  164
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.407 seconds