Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1420246
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (154)



 


 



Risks, Rules, and Institutions: A Process for Reforming Financial Regulation


Saule T. Omarova


Cornell Law School

Adam Feibelman


Tulane University - Law School


University of Memphis Law Review, Vol. 39, 2009
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1420246

Abstract:     
Reforming regulation of the financial sector is currently among the most immediate concerns of domestic and international policymakers. Proposals for such reform are proliferating, and the official sector appears committed to adopting at least some meaningful reforms in the near-term. Broadly speaking, this movement toward regulatory reform has emphasized the need for structural reforms, though it has also yielded numerous narrower substantive proposals, most of which target the perceived causes of the current crisis. Most notably, this movement has been carried along by a strong sense of the moment. Against this tide of policymaking energy, this symposium contribution urges caution and restraint. Rather than add to the still-growing body of institutional and substantive proposals, this article articulates a strategic approach to regulatory reform. It argues that the process of reforming financial regulation should begin with a comprehensive, granular study of emergent post-crisis financial markets. While such an approach would be time-consuming and labor-intensive, it is essential for identifying and measuring the on-going risks within financial markets and for responding to changes in private behavior wrought by the current crisis. Without such an inventory-taking, policymakers will run the risk of commingling crisis-containment with regulatory reform and may end up designing a retrospective framework for financial regulation. A comprehensive post-crisis inventory of financial markets would provide a meaningful basis for articulating the desirable substance and scope of financial regulation and for comparing the optimal framework with the existing one. These steps would ideally precede consideration of reforms to the institutional structure of financial regulation. Ideally, such a process of regulatory reform would reduce the potential for unnecessary or unproductive reforms and help policymakers achieve the right balance between efficient regulation and crisis-prevention going forward.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: financial regulation, banking law, regulation, regulatory reform, financial services

JEL Classification: D73, D78, E53, G10, G18, G2, G20, G28, H10, K20, L51

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Omarova, Saule T. and Feibelman, Adam, Risks, Rules, and Institutions: A Process for Reforming Financial Regulation. University of Memphis Law Review, Vol. 39, 2009; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1420246. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1420246

Contact Information

Saule T. Omarova
Cornell Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
Adam Feibelman (Contact Author)
Tulane University - Law School ( email )
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,418
Downloads: 426
Download Rank: 37,500
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  154
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 8.422 seconds