Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1422577
 


 



Cyberbullying Legislation: Why Education is Preferable to Regulation


Berin Michael Szoka


TechFreedom

Adam D. Thierer


George Mason University - Mercatus Center

June 19, 2009

Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress on Point Paper, Vol. 16, No. 12, June 2009

Abstract:     
Cyberbullying is a rising online safety concern. Compared to previous fears about online predation, which have been greatly overblown, concerns about cyberbullying are more well-founded. Evidence suggests that cyberbullying is on the rise and can have profoundly damaging consequences for children.

In the wake of a handful of high-profile cyberbullying incidents that resulted in teen suicides, some state lawmakers began floating legislation to address the issue. More recently, two very different federal approaches have been proposed. One approach is focused on the creation of a new federal felony to punish cyberbullying, which would include fines and jail time for violators. The other legislative approach is education-based and would create an Internet safety education grant program to address the issue in schools and communities.

Criminalizing what is mostly child-on-child behavior will not likely solve the age-old problem of kids mistreating each other, a problem that has traditionally been dealt with through counseling and rehabilitation at the local level. Moreover, criminalization could raise thorny free speech and due process issues related to legal definitions of harassing or intimidating speech. To the extent criminal sanctions are pursued as a solution, it may be preferable to defer to state experimentation with varying models at this time.

By contrast, education and awareness-based approaches have a chance of effectively reducing truly harmful behavior, especially over the long haul. Such approaches would have the added benefit of avoiding constitutional pitfalls and subsequent court challenges. Thus, if lawmakers feel the need to address cyberbullying concerns at this time, it is clear that regulation is, at best, premature and that education is the better approach. If federal criminal law has a role to play, it is in punishing clear cases of harassment of minors by adults in ways that do not chill free speech protected by the First Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: online safety, bullying, cyberbullying, child, safety, online, Internet, Sanchez, Menendez, Congress, bill, legislation, Szoka, Thierer, concern, minor, social networking, First Amendment, free speech, due process, federal, kids, children, child, adult, parent, schools, VAWA, COPPA

JEL Classification: I2, I28, K14, K42, K23, L5, L51, L82, L86, L96, L98, O33, O38

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Szoka, Berin Michael and Thierer, Adam D., Cyberbullying Legislation: Why Education is Preferable to Regulation (June 19, 2009). Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress on Point Paper, Vol. 16, No. 12, June 2009 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1422577 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1422577

Contact Information

Berin Michael Szoka (Contact Author)
TechFreedom ( email )
1899 L ST NW
12th Floor
Washington, DC 20036
United States
HOME PAGE: http://techfreedom.org
Adam D. Thierer
George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )
3351 Fairfax Drive
4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201-4433
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,578
Downloads: 666
Download Rank: 20,891

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.437 seconds