Footnotes (150)



Harnessing Local Variations in Federal Sentencing to Increase the System's Moral Credibility

Adam Richardson

Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal

June 19, 2009

This Essay attempts to provide an all-things-considered approach to justifying local sentencing variations in the federal system. Instead of trying to eliminate those disparities, this Essay contends that the federal sentencing system should embrace regional variations to increase the moral credibility of the system at the local level. To do this, it argues for the creation of regional sentencing commissions (one for each federal circuit), which would promulgate their own, regional sentencing guidelines. By premising each set of guidelines on Professor Paul H. Robinson’s distributive principle of empirical desert, which is informed by lay intuitions of justice, the federal system would be made to respond to community norms and conditions, thereby increasing local credibility.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: sentencing, federal sentencing, empirical desert, local variations, disparities, citizen congress, United States Sentencing Commission, United States Sentencing Guidelines

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 20, 2009 ; Last revised: February 17, 2010

Suggested Citation

Richardson, Adam, Harnessing Local Variations in Federal Sentencing to Increase the System's Moral Credibility (June 19, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1422823 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1422823

Contact Information

Adam Richardson (Contact Author)
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal ( email )
1525 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-2399
United States
(561) 373-4871 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 400
Downloads: 49
Footnotes:  150

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.891 seconds