Protest, Proportionality and the Politics of Privacy
Boston College - Law School
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2005
This Article is an exercise in comparative constitutional law and politics. It is both descriptive and analytical. It explores how - and explains why - Canada and the United States have mediated the tension between the right of access to abortion clinics and the freedom of religious expression. It also illuminates why both nations have privileged the right of access to abortion clinics over the right to free religious expression.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62
Keywords: Privacy, Religion, Religious Expression, Abortion, Canada, United States, Comparative Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law, Comparative Law, Proportionality, Abortion ClinicsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 29, 2009 ; Last revised: September 22, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds