Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1424050
 


 



Advisory Review


Richard Albert


Boston College - Law School

2008

Alberta Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2008
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-01

Abstract:     
The Notwithstanding Clause is the cornerstone of our Canadian constitutional architecture. It merges parliamentary supremacy and constitutional democracy. But the Notwithstanding Clause finds itself conceptually situated between illegitimacy and desuetude in a constitutional purgatory. This is not a promising portrait. Nonetheless, it is a blessing in disguise. The tragic failure of the Notwithstanding Clause is a fortuitous opportunity to create a new process to achieve its objectives while also remaining loyal to the intentions of its creators. That is the task I have given myself in this Article. This new process - which I call advisory review - is a new form of judicial review that is uniquely Canadian, born of Canadian roots, and consistent with Canadian constitutional traditions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Notwithstanding Clause, judicial review, Canada, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, democratic legitimacy, desuetude

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2009 ; Last revised: March 18, 2010

Suggested Citation

Albert, Richard, Advisory Review (2008). Alberta Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2008; Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1424050

Contact Information

Richard Albert (Contact Author)
Boston College - Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Boston, MA 02459-1163
United States
617.552.3930 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://richardalbert.com

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,165
Downloads: 226
Download Rank: 80,606

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds