Judging Refugees: The Clash of Power and Institutions in the Development of Australian Refugee Law
Mary Elizabeth Crock
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
June, 23 2009
Sydney Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 51-73, 2004
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/61
This article explores one aspect of the controversies that have surrounded asylum seekers and refugees in Australia: the conflict between the executive government and the courts over who should have the final say in status determinations and protection issues generally. This author argues that a combination of history, culture and geography has resulted in an extraordinary intimacy of political involvement in the business of immigration control - setting the groundwork for remarkable clashes with the judiciary. The article sketches the development of Australia's jurisprudence on refugees, exploring the impact that public controversy and direct political pressure might have had on the formation of the law. The author notes that Australia's refugee jurisprudence is recent; it is generally conservative, textual and domestic in its focus. At the same time, the author argues that the jurisprudence represents a good example of 'globalisation' in public international law as Australian courts have both come to consider the refugee jurisprudence of other countries and have themselves contributed to international jurisprudence on refugees.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: refugees, asylum seekers, immigration, executive, judiciary
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 30, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.390 seconds