Abstract

 


 



Consumer Supplier Relations, Regulation and Essential Contract Theory


Richard Lindsay Peregrine St.John Austen-Baker


Lancaster University Law School

July 23, 2008

Journal of Contract Law, Vol. 24, pp. 60-76, 2008

Abstract:     
This article interrogates certain presuppositions of consumer law and policy discourse, chiefly through the lens of Macneil's 'essential contract theory,' in particular his proposed contract norms. Three presuppositions are posited and then discussed in turn. The author concludes that the presuppositions are unjustified and, in so far as they are held in fact, present a risk of distortion in debating contract law reform.

Keywords: Contracts, contract theory, relational contract theory, essential contract theory, Ian Macneil, consumer law

JEL Classification: K12

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: June 23, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Austen-Baker, Richard Lindsay Peregrine St.John, Consumer Supplier Relations, Regulation and Essential Contract Theory (July 23, 2008). Journal of Contract Law, Vol. 24, pp. 60-76, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1424474

Contact Information

Richard Lindsay Peregrine St.John Austen-Baker (Contact Author)
Lancaster University Law School ( email )
Lancaster LA1 4YX
United Kingdom
01524 594757 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 358

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.765 seconds