Citations (1)


Footnotes (54)



Taking the Right Seriously: Hohfeldian Semiotics and Rights Discourse

Eric Engle

Fulbright Foundation

June 23, 2009

The Crit, Vol. 3, pp. 84-107, 2010

A key characteristic of contemporary legal thought is "rights discourse". I argue that most rights' discourses fail to persuade due to unscientific conceptual apparatus and mythological counterfactual views of reality. The term "right" like the term "law" is polysemic and ambiguous; due to overlap between the terms "right" and "law" most rights discourse is doomed to incoherent failure. Though most rights discourse is doomed to futility and irrelevance that isn't because of some fatal flaw in the idea of the rule of law or of logic being somehow inevitably indeterminate. A dialectics of rights is possible. Legal science can and should extirpate ambiguity, polysemicity, and confusion from rights discourse so as to compel dialectical resolution of the conflict over what is right and what rights are.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Dworkin, Rawls, Hohfeld, Semiotics, Rights, Rights Discourse, Discursive Practice, Theory, Positivism, Natural Law

JEL Classification: K19, K33

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 24, 2009 ; Last revised: March 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Engle, Eric, Taking the Right Seriously: Hohfeldian Semiotics and Rights Discourse (June 23, 2009). The Crit, Vol. 3, pp. 84-107, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1424691

Contact Information

Eric Allen Engle (Contact Author)
Fulbright Foundation ( email )
Pariser Platz
Berlin, 10099
HOME PAGE: http://transatlantictradeandinvestment.blogspot.de/
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,045
Downloads: 489
Download Rank: 35,561
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  54

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.282 seconds