Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1425224
 


 



The Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Legislation: After Buckley v. Valeo


Paul Bender


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

2002

Arizona State Law Journal, Vol, 34, p. 1105, 2002

Abstract:     
Substantive regulations of the private financing of election campaigns generally fall into one or more of three categories: (1) restrictions on the contributions that can be made to election campaigns; (2) restrictions on campaign expenditures that candidates and those under their control can make; and (3) restrictions on independent campaign expenditures, i.e., expenditures relating to campaigns by those not under the control of a candidate. In its 1976 decision Buckley v. Valeo, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the constitutional validity of each of these three kinds of regulations in response to a facial challenge to Congress's 1974 amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. The Court held that the monetary contribution limits contained in those amendments were constitutional, but that the amendments' monetary limits on both candidate and independent campaign expenditures violated the First Amendment.

Almost everyone who has commented on Buckley in the quarter century since it was decided agrees with at least part of the Court's decision. There is strong disagreement, however, about which part of the decision is correct.

This article argues that the Buckley Court was correct in holding that reasonable campaign contribution limits are constitutional and incorrect in holding that campaign expenditure limits are unconstitutional. The Court majority failed to recognize that, while campaign expenditure limits probably cannot be justified by the same legitimate and powerful reasons that support campaign contribution limits, they can be justified by other equally legitimate and powerful reasons.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: elections, First Amendment, campaign finance

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Bender, Paul, The Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Legislation: After Buckley v. Valeo (2002). Arizona State Law Journal, Vol, 34, p. 1105, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1425224

Contact Information

Paul Bender (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 298
Downloads: 22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.578 seconds