Sin Taxes: When the State Becomes the Sinner
Andrew J. Haile
Elon University School of Law
June 25, 2009
Temple Law Review, Forthcoming
Elon University Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-05
To fill budget gaps, several state legislatures have proposed increasing existing taxes on tobacco and alcohol products. In addition, some states (as well as the federal government) are considering the enactment of new 'sin taxes,' for example on high sugar drinks and internet pornography. This working paper examines the arguments for and against imposing sin taxes. It argues that the use of sin tax revenues should be limited to ameliorating the problems caused by the 'sinful' product rather than for general governmental purposes. The paper uses the Master Settlement Agreement between the states and major tobacco companies to illustrate the moral hazard that is created when states become dependent on sin tax revenues. Finally, the paper draws out lessons from the states’ experience with taxing tobacco products to identify issues that should be considered as state legislatures weigh whether to enact new sin taxes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: sin taxes, Master Settlement Agreement, tobacco, soda tax
Date posted: June 25, 2009 ; Last revised: September 16, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds