Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1425850
 
 

Footnotes (103)



 


 



What if Seeds were not Patentable?


Elizabeth I. Winston


Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law

2008

Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2008, p. 321

Abstract:     
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court held that seeds were patentable subject matter - a decision, I assert, of much discussion and little impact. Protection of agricultural intellectual property through private ordering, used both to expand the protection available through public ordering and to circumvent the restrictions public ordering places on owners of intellectual property, has provided the incentives necessary to promote investment and innovation in seeds. It has not been the patentability of seeds that has led to agricultural advances, but rather the profitability of licensing agricultural intellectual property. What if seeds were not patentable? So what if they are. Innovation in seed has been neither promoted nor incentivized by the extension of patent protection, but rather by private ordering and free markets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Patent, Contracts, License, Intellectual Property

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 26, 2009 ; Last revised: May 15, 2014

Suggested Citation

Winston, Elizabeth I., What if Seeds were not Patentable? (2008). Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2008, p. 321. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1425850

Contact Information

Elizabeth I. Winston (Contact Author)
Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law ( email )
3600 John McCormack Rd., NE
Washington, DC 20064
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 763
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 166,274
Footnotes:  103
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds