Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1428422
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (116)



 


 



Two Notions of Privacy Online


Avner Levin


Ryerson University, Ted Rogers School of Management

Patricia Sánchez Abril


University of Miami Business Law Dept.

2009

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, Vol. 11, pp. 1001-1051, 2009

Abstract:     
Users of social networking websites tend to disclose much personal information online yet seem to retain some form of an expectation of privacy. Is this expectation of privacy always unreasonable? How do users of online social networks define their expectations of privacy online?

These questions were the impetus behind an empirical study, the findings of which are presented in this Article. The project, simultaneously conducted in Canada, at Ryerson
University, and in the United States, at the University of Miami, consisted of a survey regarding personal information protection and expectations of privacy on online social networks (OSNs). approximately 2,500 young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 were surveyed about the personal information they post online, the measures they take to protect such information, and their concerns, if any, regarding their personal information. Respondents also reacted to several hypothetical scenarios in which their privacy was breached on an OSN by measures both within and beyond their control.

The theoretical assumption underlying this research project is that two prevalent and competing notions of privacy online exist: one rooted in control and the other in dignity. Of the two, the idea of privacy as control over one’s personal information has, to date, been predominant. Legislation, regulation, corporate policy, and technology are often analyzed and evaluated in terms of the measure of control offered to individuals over their personal information. Leading OSNs, such as Facebook and MySpace, propagate a notion of privacy as user control. However, online social networking poses a fundamental challenge to the theory of privacy as control. A high degree of control cannot preclude the possibility that online socializers would post unflattering, defamatory, or personal information about each other, and that this information would in turn be available to a large, if not unrestricted, online audience. Many online socializers post personal information seemingly without much concern over the loss of control, yet it seems that online socializers react with indignation when their personal information is accessed, used, or disclosed by individuals perceived to be outside their social network.

The findings presented here indicate indeed that online socializers have developed a new and arguably legitimate notion of privacy online, that if accepted by OSNs, will offer online socializers both control and protection of their dignity and reputation. We call this notion network privacy. According to network privacy, information is considered by online socializers to be private as long as it is not disclosed outside of the network to which they initially disclosed it, if it originates with them, or as long as it does not affect their established online personae, if it originates with others. OSNs, as businesses profiting from socializing online, are best positioned to offer online socializers, often the young and vulnerable, effective protection in accordance with their notion of network privacy above and beyond regular measures of personal information control, and they should be required to do so.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Levin, Avner and Sánchez Abril, Patricia, Two Notions of Privacy Online (2009). Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, Vol. 11, pp. 1001-1051, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1428422

Contact Information

Avner Levin
Ryerson University, Ted Rogers School of Management ( email )
350 Victoria Street
Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3
Canada
Patricia Abril (Contact Author)
University of Miami Business Law Dept. ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,561
Downloads: 464
Download Rank: 33,058
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  116

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds