|
||||
|
||||
Platform Siphoning
Simon P. Anderson University of Virginia - Department of Economics Joshua S. Gans University of Melbourne - Melbourne Business School; University of Melbourne - Department of Economics August 9, 2009 Abstract: The business model of commercial-financing relies on advertisers to pay for content. Advertisers will not pay if consumers unbundle the advertisements from the content (advertising bypass). TiVo, remote controls, and pop-up ad blockers are examples of adavoidance technologies. Purchasing such devices causes content providers to increase advertising levels (as has happened recently) because the remaining audience is less adverse to ads, and leads to a downward spiral. The bypass option may cause total welfare to fall. Higher avoidance reduces content quality and more mass-market content. We cast doubt on the profitability of using subscriptions to counter the impact of adavoidance.
Keywords: Two-sided markets, advertising-finance, media economics, siphoning, bypass, death spiral JEL Classifications: L82, L86, M37 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 02, 2009 ; Last revised: August 13, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.172 seconds.