|
||||
|
||||
Possibility of Death Sentence Has Divergent Effect on Verdicts for Black and White Defendants
Jack Glaser University of California, Berkeley - The Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy Karin D. Martin University of California, Berkeley - The Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy Kimberly Kahn affiliation not provided to SSRN June 24, 2009 Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper No. GSPP09-002 Abstract: When anticipating the administration of the death penalty, mock jurors may be less inclined to convict defendants. Furthermore, minority defendants have been shown to be treated more punitively. We conducted a survey-embedded experiment with a nationally representative sample to examine the effect of sentence severity as a function of defendant race, presenting respondents with a triple murder trial summary, manipulating the maximum penalty (death vs. life without parole) and the race of the defendant. Respondents who were told life-without-parole was the maximum sentence were not significantly more likely to convict Black (67.7%) than White defendants (66.7%). However, when death was the maximum sentence, respondents presented with Black defendants were significantly more likely to convict (80.0%) than were those with White defendants (55.1%). The results implicate threats to civil rights and to effective criminal incapacitation.
Keywords: Sentence severity, prejudice, discrimination, capital punishment, legal decisionmaking Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 03, 2009 ; Last revised: July 03, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.109 seconds.